Azuro vs Polymarket US

Azuro3.2/5

VS

Polymarket US4.1/5

Feature	AzuroVisit	Polymarket USVisit
Ratings
Our score	3.2/5	4.1/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Market selection	3.0	4.5
Liquidity	2.0	4.5
Fees	4.0	4.0
Resolution quality	3.5	3.5
Ease of use	3.5	4.0
Specs
Market types	Sports	Politics, Sports, Crypto, Weather
Settles in	Not disclosed	USD
Chains	Polygon, Arbitrum, Base, Other	Other
Trading fees	Not disclosed	0% maker fee; taker fees vary by contract type
Resolution source	Supra	Settlement Committee and centralized exchange reports
Available in the US	Not disclosed	Yes
KYC required	Not disclosed	Yes
Regulated venue	No	Yes
Market topics	Sports, Predictions, Gaming	NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, Tennis, Soccer, US Midterms, Elections, Cryptocurrency, Weather
Mobile app	No	Yes
Liquidity rewards	Yes	Yes
Company
Founded	2022	2020
Headquarters	—	United States
Investors	Flow Ventures, Gnosis, Polymorphic Capital, Arrington Capital +21	Founders Fund, Intercontinental Exchange, 1789 Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Shared liquidity eliminates the need for applications to seed individual market books Frontend developers receive a 70% monthly protocol revenue share Deployed across six EVM chains including Arbitrum, Base, and Polygon Audits are published publicly on GitHub	CFTC Designated Contract Market status Zero maker trading fees with maker rebates supported by taker fees Combo functionality enables grouping 2 to 10 markets into one trade The broader Polymarket entity has disclosed $2.764B in funding, including a $1B investment from Intercontinental Exchange
Cons	Contained an infrastructure wallet security attack in October 2026, causing operational pauses Total value locked is thin at under $300,000 in October 2026 Liquidity providers take on counterparty risk against aggregate bettor performance Primary market focus is limited to sports predictions	Strict identity verification required, excluding anonymous trading Restricted exclusively to United States residents Centralized clearing model exposes users to clearinghouse counterparty risk Disputed or unresolvable legs rely on discretionary pricing from an internal Settlement Committee
Best for	Developers launching EVM prediction frontends, LPs seeking yield on sports liquidity pools, Bettors using decentralized sports prediction apps	US residents trading regulated event contracts, Sports bettors building multi-leg combo positions, Political forecasters following US midterm elections

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.