Axelar vs Squid

How Axelar vs Squid compare on our ratings, bridge specs, funding, pros and cons.

Axelar3.9/5
VS
Squid4.4/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.9/54.4/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Security4.04.0
Speed3.54.5
Fees3.54.5
Chain coverage4.55.0
Ease of use4.04.5
Specs
KYC required NoNot disclosed
DesignMessaging protocolAggregator
ChainsEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Cosmos, OtherEthereum, BNB Chain, Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Avalanche, Cosmos, Other
Chains supported80100
Typical feeNot disclosed0% on stablecoin swaps; variable route and gas fees
Typical transfer timeNot disclosed5s
Security modelProof-of-stake validator setDepends on the underlying route
Audited Yes Yes
TokenAXLQUID
Intent-basedNot disclosed Yes
Native token transfers (no wrapped tokens) Yes Yes
Company
Founded20202022
Headquarters—Virgin Islands, British
InvestorsPolychain Capital, Arrington Capital, C Squared, Distributed Global +33North Island Ventures, Polychain Capital
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Connects more than 80 blockchains across EVM, Cosmos, and Solana ecosystems
  • Secured by a decentralized set of over 75 proof-of-stake validators
  • No recorded validator-set or bridge consensus security exploits
  • Supports generic cross-chain contract messaging alongside token transfers
  • Routes across 100+ chains including non-EVM networks like Solana, XRPL, and Cosmos
  • Zero protocol fees charged on stablecoin swaps
  • Executes swaps in native tokens without issuing wrapped assets
  • Completed 9 security audits with no historical protocol exploits
Cons
  • Security depends on the economic bonding and validator quorum of the AXL chain
  • Outages on connected external chains can delay or pause transfer execution
  • Variable routing fees apply to non-stablecoin token swaps
  • Security depends on multiple third-party bridges and solver networks
  • Potential for slippage or execution delays during extreme liquidity shortfalls
Best forDevelopers deploying multichain smart contracts, Users bridging between EVM and Cosmos, Institutions routing liquidity to onchain venuesNon-EVM to EVM token traders, DeFi users moving stablecoins fee-free, Developers embedding cross-chain swap widgets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons