Arch Lending vs OKX Earn

How Arch Lending vs OKX Earn compare on our ratings, earn platform specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.0/54.1/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Rates4.04.0
Security4.54.5
Transparency4.04.0
Flexibility4.04.0
Support3.04.0
Specs
KYC required Yes Yes
ProductsCrypto-backed loansSavings / earn, Staking, Dual investment
Highest advertised APYNot disclosed18.81%
Max loan-to-value60%Not disclosed
Loan APR from7.25%Not disclosed
Supported assetsNot disclosed20
Available inUnited StatesEurope (EEA), United States, Global
Proof of reservesNot disclosed Yes
Insurance$100M Lloyd's of London policy through custodian Anchorage DigitalNot disclosed
Licenses & registrationsUS State Lending LicensesMiCA
Flexible (withdraw any time) Yes Yes
Fixed terms Yes Yes
Company
Founded2022—
HeadquartersUnited StatesMalta
InvestorsNot disclosedIntercontinental Exchange (ICE)
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • No rehypothecation with collateral held at Anchorage Digital
  • Starting interest rates from 7.25% APR
  • Zero prepayment penalties for early settlement
  • Partial liquidations instead of full position sales during margin events
  • Operates under a full European MiCA licence across 30 countries
  • Backing from Intercontinental Exchange following a $200M strategic funding round
  • Publishes regular cryptographic proof of reserves for platform assets
  • Zero percent subscription fee for basic savings products
Cons
  • Mandatory KYC identity verification for all borrowers
  • Maximum loan-to-value capped at 60%
  • Loan durations limited to 12 months
  • Collateral liquidation risk during sharp crypto price drops
  • Deducts a 15% service fee from on-chain staking rewards
  • Full custodial exposure makes user funds vulnerable to platform insolvency
  • Disclaims liability for losses caused by third-party DeFi protocol failures
  • Mandatory identity verification prevents anonymous participation
Best forUS borrowers seeking crypto liquidity, Long-term Bitcoin and Ethereum holders, Borrowers needing non-rehypothecated institutional custodyVerified European exchange users, Holders seeking passive proof-of-stake rewards, Traders using structured dual-currency products

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons