Arbitrum vs Intmax

How Arbitrum vs Intmax compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Intmax3.9/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/53.9/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Performance4.54.5
Fees4.55.0
Ecosystem5.03.0
Decentralization3.04.0
Developer experience4.53.0
Specs
LayerLayer 2Layer 2
Consensus / designOptimistic rollupZK rollup
Native tokenARBITX
EVM compatible Yes No
Smart contract languagesSolidity, Rust (Stylus)Not disclosed
Block time~0.25 secondsNot disclosed
Typical transaction feeNot disclosedNear-zero
Finality~7 days (dispute window)Near-instant
Validators / sequencerNot disclosedPermissionless block producers relying on Layer 1 consensus
Mainnet since2,0212,025
SequencerCentralizedNot applicable
Data availabilityEthereum L1 calldata / EIP-4844 blobsClient-side with 4-5 bytes posted on-chain
Gas paid inETHNot disclosed
Company
Founded2021—
HeadquartersUnited StatesSwitzerland
InvestorsCoinbase Ventures, IOSG Ventures, OKX Ventures, ParaFi Capital +1Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Secured over $12.3B in value with 2.7 billion lifetime transactions by mid-2026
  • Supports smart contracts in Rust, C, and C++ alongside standard EVM Solidity
  • Fast sub-second block times around 0.25 seconds with gas settled in ETH
  • Posts only 4 to 5 bytes on-chain per transaction to Ethereum
  • Stateless model eliminates centralized sequencer censorship risks
  • Account balances remain confidential on local user devices
  • Direct Ethereum consensus reliance avoids separate validator risks
Cons
  • Sequencer remains centralized, creating liveness and transaction ordering dependencies
  • ARB staking through the DAO does not distribute protocol fee revenue to holders
  • Substantial non-circulating ARB supply remains subject to scheduled token unlocks
  • Lacks EVM compatibility for standard decentralized applications
  • Users must manage local client-side state records on their devices
  • Restricted primarily to payments rather than arbitrary smart contracts
Best forHigh-frequency DeFi traders, Rust and Solidity smart contract developers, Teams launching dedicated Orbit appchainsConfidential Ethereum token transfers, High-frequency stablecoin payment merchants, Developers needing minimal on-chain gas footprints

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons