Amber Group vs BlackRock
How Amber Group vs BlackRock compare on our ratings, asset manager specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.2/5 | 4.4/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Track record & size | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| Product range | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Fees | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Regulation & custody | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| Transparency | 2.5 | 4.0 |
| Specs | ||
| Products | Private funds, Managed accounts | Spot ETFs, Index funds, Private funds, Managed accounts, Tokenized funds |
| Clients | Accredited investors, Institutions | Retail, Institutions, Financial advisors |
| Assets under management | $1B (June 2021) | $15.3 trillion as of June 2026 |
| Flagship products | Digital Wealth Management, Institutional Asset Management, Liquidity Solutions, Amber Labs | iShares ETFs, Aladdin, BlackRock Solutions |
| Assets covered | Not disclosed | Equities, Bonds, Digital assets |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 1988 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | United States |
| Investors | China Renaissance, Arena Holdings, Blockchain.com, Coinbase Ventures +7 | Not disclosed |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Institutions needing market liquidity, Family offices seeking quant management, Web3 teams seeking infrastructure support | Institutional portfolio managers, Financial advisors, ETF investors |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

