Alchemy vs Securitize

Alchemy4.3/5

VS

Securitize3.6/5

Feature	AlchemyVisit	SecuritizeVisit
Ratings
Our score	4.3/5	3.6/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Reliability	4.5	4.5
Chain coverage	4.5	3.0
Pricing	4.0	3.0
Developer experience	4.5	3.0
Support	4.0	4.0
Specs
Services	RPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer tooling	Not disclosed
Chains supported	100	1
Free tier	Yes	Not disclosed
Pricing from	$0.525 per 1,000,000 compute units	Not disclosed
Enterprise SLA	Yes	Not disclosed
Uptime SLA	99.99%	Not disclosed
Free tier limits	30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooks	Not disclosed
Company
Founded	2017	2017
Headquarters	United States	United States
Investors	Archetype	Blockchain Capital, Morgan Stanley
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	100+ supported blockchains Free tier includes 30M compute units monthly Enterprise SLAs reach 99.995% availability RPC, indexed data and wallet APIs share one platform	Operates an SEC-regulated broker-dealer and registered Alternative Trading System Publicly listed on the New York Stock Exchange under SECZ Manages tokenization for roughly 3,000 clients Supported by Morgan Stanley and Blockchain Capital
Cons	Applications face centralised provider and outage exposure Proprietary APIs can increase vendor lock-in Pay As You Go charges scale with compute usage Automated agent wallets add transaction-control risk	Strict identity checks exclude retail users in unsupported jurisdictions Public chain deployments remain exposed to Solana network congestion risks
Best for	Multichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction products	Institutions issuing tokenized private funds, Asset managers building onchain equities, Accredited investors seeking secondary private assets

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons