Alchemy vs RTrade Technologies

How Alchemy vs RTrade Technologies compare on our ratings, infrastructure provider specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature
Ratings
Our score4.3/51.5/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Reliability4.51.0
Chain coverage4.51.5
Pricing4.01.0
Developer experience4.53.0
Support4.01.0
Specs
ServicesRPC / nodes, Data APIs, Wallet APIs, Account abstraction, Developer toolingOracle, Developer tooling
Chains supported100Not disclosed
Free tier YesNot disclosed
Pricing from$0.525 per 1,000,000 compute unitsNot disclosed
Enterprise SLA YesNot disclosed
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
TokenNot disclosedRTC
Uptime SLA99.99%Not disclosed
Free tier limits30M compute units per month, up to 15 RPS, 5 apps, 5 webhooksNot disclosed
Company
Founded2017—
HeadquartersUnited States—
InvestorsArchetypeNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • 100+ supported blockchains
  • Free tier includes 30M compute units monthly
  • Enterprise SLAs reach 99.995% availability
  • RPC, indexed data and wallet APIs share one platform
  • 252 public GitHub repositories are associated with RTrade Technologies
  • IPFS storage is linked to Solidity smart-contract references
  • Chainlink partnership announced in October 2018
  • Work covers both storage and oracle infrastructure
Cons
  • Applications face centralised provider and outage exposure
  • Proprietary APIs can increase vendor lock-in
  • Pay As You Go charges scale with compute usage
  • Automated agent wallets add transaction-control risk
  • The official website currently hosts no active product content
  • RTC creates token-related exposure around the infrastructure project
Best forMultichain application teams, Solana developers, Account-abstraction productsIPFS infrastructure research, Smart-contract storage projects, Historical oracle research

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons