Aerodrome vs PancakeSwap

How Aerodrome vs PancakeSwap compare on our ratings, dex specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Feature
Ratings
Our score3.2/54.0/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Liquidity & pricing4.54.5
Fees3.03.5
Security3.03.5
Ease of use3.54.0
Chain coverage2.05.0
Specs
KYC requiredNot disclosed No
TypeAMMAMM
ChainsBase, OtherBNB Chain, Ethereum, Aptos, Base, Arbitrum
Swap feeNot disclosedFees vary by product and pool.
Cross-chain swapsNot disclosed Yes
Audited Yes Yes
Open sourceNot disclosed Yes
Governance tokenAEROCAKE
Perpetual futuresNot disclosed Yes
Points or rewards program Yes Yes
Company
Founded20232020
Headquarters—Japan
InvestorsNot disclosedYZi Labs
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • $232.6 million TVL on Base as of October 16, 2026
  • Concentrated-liquidity pools through Slipstream
  • veAERO holders direct weekly liquidity emissions
  • MixBytes audit recorded for 2025
  • Available across 11+ blockchain networks
  • Non-custodial wallet-based access without KYC
  • Open-source contracts with audits from six security firms
  • About $1.56B locked as of October 17, 2026
Cons
  • Currently focused on Base before the planned merger
  • AMM trades carry slippage and impermanent-loss risk
  • AERO rewards depend on governance emissions
  • November 2025 DNS attack redirected visitors to a malicious frontend
  • Permissionless listings increase counterfeit-token and smart-contract risk
  • Swap fees vary by product, pool and fee tier
  • AMM trades remain exposed to slippage and MEV
  • Cross-chain products add bridge and message-passing risk
Best forBase token traders, Concentrated-liquidity providers, veAERO governance participantsMultichain spot traders, BNB Chain liquidity providers, CAKE staking users

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

More comparisons