aelf vs Arbitrum
How aelf vs Arbitrum compare on our ratings, blockchain specs, funding, pros and cons.
| Feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ratings | ||
| Our score | 3.0/5 | 4.2/5 |
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Performance | 3.0 | 4.5 |
| Fees | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Ecosystem | 2.0 | 5.0 |
| Decentralization | 2.5 | 3.0 |
| Developer experience | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Specs | ||
| Layer | Layer 1 | Layer 2 |
| Consensus / design | Delegated PoS | Optimistic rollup |
| Native token | ELF | ARB |
| EVM compatible | No | Yes |
| Smart contract languages | C# | Solidity, Rust (Stylus) |
| Block time | Not disclosed | ~0.25 seconds |
| Finality | Not disclosed | ~7 days (dispute window) |
| Mainnet since | Not disclosed | 2,021 |
| Sequencer | Not applicable | Centralized |
| Data availability | Not disclosed | Ethereum L1 calldata / EIP-4844 blobs |
| Gas paid in | ELF | ETH |
| Company | ||
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | United States |
| Investors | Arrington Capital, Draper Dragon, Galaxy Digital | Coinbase Ventures, IOSG Ventures, OKX Ventures, ParaFi Capital +1 |
| Strengths and weaknesses | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Best for | Developers needing dedicated sidechains, Teams building EVM cross-chain integrations, C# and multi-language smart contract programmers | High-frequency DeFi traders, Rust and Solidity smart contract developers, Teams launching dedicated Orbit appchains |
Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.

