21shares vs Invesco

How 21shares vs Invesco compare on our ratings, asset manager specs, funding, pros and cons.

Feature	21shares Visit	Invesco Visit
Ratings
Our score	4.2/5	4.0/5
User rating	No reviews yet	No reviews yet
Track record & size	4.5	5.0
Product range	5.0	3.0
Fees	3.5	3.0
Regulation & custody	4.0	4.5
Transparency	4.0	4.0
Specs
Products	Spot ETFs, ETPs / ETNs, Index funds, Staking products	Spot ETFs
Clients	Retail, Institutions, Financial advisors	Retail, Institutions, Financial advisors
Assets under management	$11.3B	$2,537.8 billion as of September 30, 2026
Flagship products	CBTC, ETHC, CSOL, ABBA, BOLD, HODLX	Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF, BTCO
Assets covered	BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, HYPE, SUI, DOGE, DOT	Bitcoin
Fees	0.10% to 1.49% p.a.	Not disclosed
Regulators	Not disclosed	U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Company
Founded	2018	—
Headquarters	Switzerland	United States
Investors	Not disclosed	Not disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros	Over $11B in assets under management across 48 exchange-traded products Physical collateral backing avoids direct futures roll costs on spot products Competitive management fees starting at 0.10% on core Bitcoin and Ethereum ETPs Trading via standard brokerage accounts on 13 regulated stock exchanges	$2,537.8 billion in AUM as of September 30, 2026 BTCO offers exchange-traded bitcoin exposure on Cboe BZX Founded in 1935 with a public-company history since August 1995 Serves clients in more than 120 countries
Cons	Legacy and basket ETP expense ratios reach up to 1.49% per year Exchange-traded notes carry structural counterparty risk as collateralized debt obligations Restricted to professional investors in jurisdictions like Belgium ETP structures lack the independent board protections of 1940-Act mutual funds	BTCO's trust expenses reduce returns against bitcoin's reference rate Bitcoin exposure remains subject to sharp price volatility The product line shown here is focused on bitcoin ETF shares can trade at premiums or discounts to underlying exposure
Best for	Traditional brokerage investors avoiding self-custody, European wealth managers balancing crypto portfolios, Allocators seeking exchange-listed staking exposure	Brokerage-based bitcoin exposure, Institutional portfolio allocations, Financial adviser-led portfolios

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.