21shares vs Galaxy

How 21shares vs Galaxy compare on our ratings, asset manager specs, funding, pros and cons.

VS
Galaxy4.3/5
Feature
Ratings
Our score4.2/54.3/5
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Track record & size4.54.5
Product range5.04.5
Fees3.53.0
Regulation & custody4.04.5
Transparency4.04.5
Specs
ProductsSpot ETFs, ETPs / ETNs, Index funds, Staking productsSpot ETFs, ETPs / ETNs, Index funds, Private funds, Staking products
ClientsRetail, Institutions, Financial advisorsRetail, Accredited investors, Institutions, Financial advisors
Assets under management$11.3BNot disclosed
Flagship productsCBTC, ETHC, CSOL, ABBA, BOLD, HODLXInvesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF (BTCO), XBSE, DECO, HECO, CCCX
Assets coveredBTC, ETH, SOL, XRP, HYPE, SUI, DOGE, DOTBitcoin, Ethereum, Solana
Fees0.10% to 1.49% p.a.Not disclosed
CustodiansNot disclosedGK8
Company
Founded20182018
HeadquartersSwitzerlandUnited States
InvestorsNot disclosedNot disclosed
Strengths and weaknesses
Pros
  • Over $11B in assets under management across 48 exchange-traded products
  • Physical collateral backing avoids direct futures roll costs on spot products
  • Competitive management fees starting at 0.10% on core Bitcoin and Ethereum ETPs
  • Trading via standard brokerage accounts on 13 regulated stock exchanges
  • Nasdaq-listed firm operating digital asset funds since 2018
  • Spot Bitcoin ETF issued with major partner Invesco
  • Regulated investment structures spanning the US, Canada, and Europe
  • Average loan book reached $1.4B in Q2 2026
Cons
  • Legacy and basket ETP expense ratios reach up to 1.49% per year
  • Exchange-traded notes carry structural counterparty risk as collateralized debt obligations
  • Restricted to professional investors in jurisdictions like Belgium
  • ETP structures lack the independent board protections of 1940-Act mutual funds
  • Private funds restricted to accredited and institutional investors
  • Expense ratios and management fees diminish long-term fund returns
  • Underlying asset returns remain exposed to sharp crypto market drawdowns
Best forTraditional brokerage investors avoiding self-custody, European wealth managers balancing crypto portfolios, Allocators seeking exchange-listed staking exposureInstitutions allocating to digital assets, Investors seeking regulated spot ETFs, Advisors requiring audited crypto funds

Highlighted cells show the stronger value in each row. Data comes from each provider's site and public sources; check details before you sign up.